Know About AI Language Is Backwards? Modern AI treats words as the starting point of meaning. Humans know better. A new framework for building truly

Humanity_AI_Newsletter_LinkedIn_1.pdf

Download PDF • 83KB

Modern artificial intelligence has inherited a deceptively simple assumption: that language is primarily a matter of words, and that more data and larger models naturally lead to better understanding. This assumption has driven the rise of large language models trained predominantly on high-resource languages—English,

Mandarin, Spanish. At the same time, it has left something essential behind: low-resource languages, embodied forms of communication, and the emotional nuance that makes human expression human. To understand why—and to imagine what a unified model of language and intelligence would truly require—we must

examine the relationship between languages and models, the forces driving scale, and the elements that matter regardless of size.

The conclusion may challenge everything you thought you knew about how AI should work.

Why Large Models Dominate

Large-resource languages are defined not by intrinsic superiority, but by data abundance: massive digitized text corpora, standardized writing systems, institutional reinforcement through education, media, law, and technology. These properties align perfectly with the strengths of large neural models.

LLMs excel at detecting statistical patterns, compressing regularities, and generalizing across vast symbol spaces. The result? Large languages shape large models—not because they represent human language as a whole, but because they

are easiest to learn from at scale.

What Gets Left Behind

Low-resource languages tell a different story. They are characterized by sparse written data, strong oral and gestural

components, meaning encoded in tone, rhythm, timing, and social context, and high information density per utterance.

These languages are not "simpler.

"In many ways, they are richer, carrying meaning earlier in the communicative

pipeline—before words fully crystallize. When trained naively, large models flatten these features, because the model is optimized for text-level prediction rather than state-level meaning.

"Model size correlates with where meaning is handled—not with how much

meaning exists."

HUMANITY + AI INSIGHTS

The Missing Link

Despite their differences, all human languages—and all functional models—share a common underlying structure. Here is

the truth that current AI systematically ignores:

Language does not begin with words.